Windows and OSX The Small Differences that Only Become Apparent After Months of Usage

In my apartment are both Macs and PCs I have Windows machines and my flatmate uses an eMac and a PowerBook. Since 2004 I have noticed the niggles that each operating system is on a frequent basis. Neither platform is without problems, but each has its own individual characteristics that users should be aware when choosing a new computer.
The XP clock
Using Windows XP, I once failed to arrive in time to update correctly. This may sound like a minor issue, but in fact it has made me lose trains in the past. Windows time will begin to lose minutes, in a matter of weeks, if not synchronized on a regular basis and for some unknown reason, can not find a timeserver. In contrast, Apple OS has no problem in maintaining all the time and he updated even make allowances for daylight savings. A batch of technical seeking a definitive answer to the question: What is best ", Mac or PC? " However, nobody has nobody mentioned this problem in any of the arguments. If it appears that many users do not have to fix both Apple and Windows machines, day in day out for a few months.
Sheer processing power
Both systems were purchased around the same time and in roughly the same amount of money, then they should by rights CPU power Tuesday similar. But Apples are generally expensive than PCs Testing them side by side, is to launch the same file in Photoshop and then apply some filters. Windows-based computer can consistently beat the eMac by 3 times. If you want to use the computer for Photoshop work, the video coding, or other processor intensive tasks then you possibly get more value with a PC.
Hibernation and sleeping
Lots of PCs are left on all day and all night. If you have driven past a block of offices after dark you should have seen many screen savers of computers that have not been closed. I do not think this is because of pure laziness, it may be because Windows XP is not well adapted to hibernate. In contrast, Apple computers will awaken from hibernation in moments and is then ready for use. From an energy saving perspective of the Mac won easily - standby is an option in some PCs, but in my experience is often unable to wake.
Aesthetics
Most agree that XP was a monumental step forward in Windows ME or 98, but people say As it is not visually attractive as the Mac OS X. Each icon in the Top 10 is designed to give a super slick presentation. This additional " eye-candy ", sometimes not affect performance if you have an older Mac, but for the latest Intel Macs this must stop being a hindrance.
Overclocking
This not apply to many users, but overclocking is an incredible technique to enjoy enormous speed increases of a budget computer. Running the components in greater " overclocked " rate you can experience the kind of performance you can expect from a computer worth twice more. I have seen Macs overclocked, but I think there is much less support on the Internet for this type of hobby.
Overall
In 2004, my computer was undoubtedly the right system to obtain, in terms of value of money. If you are a completely non-technical consumer, then a computer Apple would have been a more appropriate option. Currently, with the death of the old PPC processor, I think my next computer will probably be Apple& 39;s. The cost can be 20% higher, but the operating system is supposedly the best around, and every last application for OS X is much anger. ComputerGuruZach is the author of Speed-Up-Windows-XP.com, a site that can teach you how to make your computer faster. Instead of complaining ", my computer is slow ", can breathe new life into slow start XP PCs Business & Technologies.com



Bookmark it: