The issue with developing countries is the lack of infrastructure & 39;. Our case study of Pakistan showed that all of Pakistan has only d & 39; a backbone fiber, which resulted in bottlenecks d & 39; strangulation. L & 39; lack of redundancy has its costs in July 2005, the fiber has broken the wire d & 39; cause immense power outages. The back satellite n & 39; is little solace to & 39; emerging industry of Pakistan.
A significant percentage of traffic in Pakistan is national, but it is routed through servers in the USA and Europe. L & 39; footprint d & 39; a route Pakistan & 39; supplier of Internet access to another model produced a shocking packets travel from Pakistan to the United Kingdom, USA, Singapore and return to Pakistan . The situation is compounded in the case of fibre failures, when traffic is carried on several satellite hops. The latency is d & 39; about 700 milliseconds / hop (or approximately 1.5 seconds for each transaction). This adds not only latency, unnecessarily increase costs but stifles genuine Pakistan connection slowdown in international trade.
Internet Exchange Point is a facility to enable & 39; peering between different ISPs. In general, ISPs must pay tier-1 suppliers or the Conseil d & 39; hotel (for example, Pakistan Telecom Authority) for the carriage of traffic. Even if traffic is local, in the absence & 39; d & 39; point, traffic is routed over the Internet & 39;.
The agreement & 39; peering enables service providers local Internet exchange traffic on a barter basis, rather than on a cash basis net neutrality be the key. These arrangements circumvent the protocol & 39; ITU, with regard to revenue sharing and allow lower net cost to all participants ISP.
The point d & 39; essentially allows exchange of & 39; ISPs to segment traffic, according to destination and increase the level-1 suppliers. The results are considerably lower cost and lower latency period.
The holders anchored in developing countries (like Pakistan) have the most to lose in & 39; inside the & 39; exchange and movement are the biggest obstacles to the adoption & 39;. The governments of these countries also have an interest in supporting the monopoly of telecommunication companies, including income and taxes received. The biggest supplier of & 39; access also have an interest in the use & 39; high cost of connectivity to accelerate the exit of smaller or less-capitalized players through attrition.
In conclusion, to take advantage of points d & 39; Internet exchange, telecommunications, companies must overcome their monopoly and there must be an effort to make a neutral body responsible for traffic sharing facilities. The lower cost of Internet & 39; actually promote the overall growth of overall traffic, which offset the monopolies " initial loss of international traffic.
For d & 39; more information on & 39; satellite Internet Exchange, visit: http://www.nayasat.com/satellite-internet-exchange.html
A floral arrangement reflects our process of Thought - simplistic to subtly complex. Jill Murtha and guests http://www.classicalmesh.com expresses his passion for flowers, their provision by & 39; writing and discussion. She works for the cheapest Corporation http://www.ixs.net
Bookmark it:
